Antisemitism is a serious problem, but codifying a legal definition could have dangerous implications for free speech. Currently, there's a push for Congress to codify the IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism. With its its broad and problematic characterization of antisemitism, the IHRA definition poses a particular threat to open discourse. It can be easily be misappropriated to suppress and stifle legitimate criticism and dissent. Even the lead drafter of the IHRA definition has spoken out against it being adopted a legal framework.

We oppose adopting any legal definition of antisemitism that poses a threat to free speech and legitimate criticism. No other oppression is singularly defined in the law this way. Antisemitism should not be exceptionalized, especially in a way that locks its definition into just one framework and understanding. We must dismantle antisemitism, in solidarity with all who are threatened by white supremacy, but a legal definition can be used to divide us — from other Jews and from our allies.

Take action here to reject the codification of the IHRA antisemitism definition.